The “gang of 8”, Senators Schumer, McCain, Durbin, Graham, Menendez, Rubio, Bennet, and Flake has released its Bipartisan Framework for Comprehensive Immigration Reform on Jan. 28, 2013.
Here's coverage from the New York Times.
We need to stop scoring cheap political points and playing games with immigration and start working together.Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), another longtime champion of comprehensive immigration reform, also spoke against the STEM Jobs Act when she introduced a motion to recommit—to present a “clean STEM visa program” without “the unrelated measures” (the language eliminating the diversity lottery). The motion eventually failed.
Which is why it is so DISAPPOINTING the majority decided to undermine an area of bipartisan agreement on STEM visas by loading up the measure with provisions that are a slap in the face to the core values of the United States.
If you support this bill, you are saying that one group of immigrants is better than another and one type of educated, degree-holding person and their work is more important than another’s.
Eliminating the diversity visa has nothing to do with the STEM visa. It’s an unfortunate attack against minorities and it has no place in the STEM bill. It’s also remarkably tone deaf considering the recent election just 3 weeks ago. Minorities and immigrant communities sent a powerful message to our friends on the other side of the aisle, our friends say they heard that message, they acknowledge the need to reach out to those communities and take a different tack with respect to immigration.
Actions speak louder than words. If you want to reach out to minorities, perhaps you shouldn’t start with a bill that eliminates the diversity visa. And if you want to reach out to immigrants, perhaps you shouldn’t start with a bill that pits immigrant communities against each other. The choice between stem immigrants and diversity immigrants is one we are being forced to make. We do not need to make it."